![]() In recent years there has been some agreement in the literature that social capital relates to networks, trust and norms. This can allow scholars to position their research within this broad typology and improve their understanding of how their chosen approach overlaps and contrasts with other theoretical approaches.ĭimensions of social capital and levels of analysis This article attempts to distinguish phenomena at different levels of analysis and their relationship to different dimensions of social capital. This will be useful to anyone who is new to social capital and may provide experienced social capital scholars with an opportunity for reflection and elucidation. This article aims to assist students and scholars to make sense of the many conceptualisations and theoretical treatments of social capital in the literature. This can be a difficult task, even for experienced scholars. ![]() To maintain theoretical rigour, it is vital to distinguish between different approaches to avoid mixing and matching definitions, conceptualisations, and methodologies from distinct approaches. These differences can present a significant challenge for researchers and practitioners who are new to social capital. It has become common to differentiate between different approaches, different dimensions, different types and different levels, but confusion and contradiction continues to reign in much of the literature. There have been some excellent attempts to order the chaos created by these diverse approaches to social capital and frequent poor scholarship (for further details see Claridge, 2018 ). There are scholars who conceptualise social capital as it relates to resources, while others take the capital metaphor further to consider a range of tangible and intangible benefits of sociability.ĭifferences can present a significant challenge for researchers and practitioners For some scholars, it relates only to social relationships, while for others, it extends to social setting and social structures. Some authors treat social capital as a private good, some as a public good, and others as having both private and public good characteristics. It is often treated differently in different contexts and at different levels of analysis. Social capital has been criticised for being incredibly broad and potentially related to everything, a kind of catch-all.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |